“In a recent Esquire column, Charles Pierce recalled presidential historian George Reedy’s prediction years ago that so-called ‘shield laws,’ which protect reporters against criminal prosecution for not revealing their sources, would involve de facto government licensing of the press. After all, the law would have to define who qualified as a ‘journalist’ for purposes of such legal protection. And guess what? US Senator Dianne Feinstein just bore him out. She ‘insisted on limiting the legal protection to ‘real reporters’ and not, she said, a 17-year-old with his own website.'”
Related posts:
Obamacare will hurt young people most
What Happens When You Can't Believe A Thing The President Says?
Why the Higher Education System Is Unsustainable (i.e. Doomed)
David Stockman: The End of U.S. Imperium—Finally!
Killing Without Consequences: "Counter-Insurgency" Warfare in Greenfield, CA
"For Your Own Protection"
Judge Napolitano: Is the FISA Court constitutional?
The Tax-Evaders Who Never Make The News
American Banksterism Through the Ages
Carlo Ponzi, Alias Uncle Sam
The Federal Reserve's Cargo Cult Magic: Housing Will Lift the Economy (Again)
Bill Bonner: Price does not tell you all you need to know
Why a single mom is better off with a $29,000 job than a $69,000 job
Philip Giraldi: Where Are They Now?
Gold and Syria
