“In a recent Esquire column, Charles Pierce recalled presidential historian George Reedy’s prediction years ago that so-called ‘shield laws,’ which protect reporters against criminal prosecution for not revealing their sources, would involve de facto government licensing of the press. After all, the law would have to define who qualified as a ‘journalist’ for purposes of such legal protection. And guess what? US Senator Dianne Feinstein just bore him out. She ‘insisted on limiting the legal protection to ‘real reporters’ and not, she said, a 17-year-old with his own website.'”
Related posts:
U.S. Constitution Created an Empire
The Case for Abolishing the Department of Homeland Security
Pelosi: Willing to "Protect" Syrian Children To Death
Obama Has Decided That It Is Safer To Buy Congress Than To Go It Alone
The Throwaways: Pawns in the War on Drugs
Bitcoin's dilemma: go mainstream, or stay radical?
The Emergency Destruction of American Liberty
Jeffrey Tucker: Is Bitcoin Real or Not?
Karl Hess: Tools to Dismantle the State
Cheating to Learn: How a UCLA professor gamed a game theory midterm
Doug Casey at Libertopia 2012
David Galland: Scenarios
Why a pizza can’t fly
A Cypherpunk's Manifesto (March 9th, 1993)
CTRAFFIK -"What if Nobody Showed Up to Vote?" (Official Video)
