“The US Supreme Court has ruled that police may search a home without obtaining a warrant despite the objection of one occupant if that occupant has been removed from the premises. With its 6 to 3 decision in Fernandez v. California on Tuesday, the Court sided with law enforcement’s ability to conduct warrantless searches after restricting police powers with its 2006 decision on a similar case. Prior to Randolph and Fernandez, the Court ruled in the 1974 case United States v. Matlock that any one of the co-tenants in a home can consent to a police search of the premises.”
http://rt.com/usa/police-warrantless-search-permission-744/
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
The Problem of Leviathan
Police Department Planted Drugs on Young Black Men For Years; D.A. Complicit
Schools scanned students' irises without permission as part of public-private program
This Hated Stock Could Double From Here
Library’s Tor relay—pulled after feds noticed—now restored
Volcker Travelled as Chase Bank Official to Kuwait; Was Viewed as Federal Reserve Official
Creeping Capital Controls At JPMorgan Chase?
Labor Day ‘Mackinac Bridge Walk’ will feature warrantless bag searches
How 7.9 million people adopt Bitcoin in the Middle East
Review: Ploom Model Two
The FED Does Not Control the Federal Funds Rate
White House refuses to accept that NSA phone dragnet is illegal
The Larger the Deficit, the Greater the Default
Nigel Farage destroys Barroso's State of the Union
Janet Yellen, Most Powerful Sacrifice in the World?