“The US Supreme Court has ruled that police may search a home without obtaining a warrant despite the objection of one occupant if that occupant has been removed from the premises. With its 6 to 3 decision in Fernandez v. California on Tuesday, the Court sided with law enforcement’s ability to conduct warrantless searches after restricting police powers with its 2006 decision on a similar case. Prior to Randolph and Fernandez, the Court ruled in the 1974 case United States v. Matlock that any one of the co-tenants in a home can consent to a police search of the premises.”
http://rt.com/usa/police-warrantless-search-permission-744/
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Feds fund $100,000 video game featuring female climate change 'superhero'
Swiss Gold Referendum: What It Really Means
6 Whopping Government Misstatements About NSA Spying
Americans Used to Tar-and-Feather Tax Collectors
Will the Congressional Budget Hurt People in Your Name?
Draconian Cash Controls Are Coming To France
The World’s First Cashless Society Is Here - A Totalitarian’s Dream Come True
Arizona Man Holding Air Rifle Killed In His Own Backyard In Drug Raid
The room with 260 million surfaces: 3D printed architecture is here
The Eurozone Unemployment Picture
CBO: Up to 20 Million Could Be Pushed Off Employer Health Insurance Because of Obamacare
Sony's credit rating heads toward junk pile
Was World War 2 a "good war?"
CurrencyFair Suspends Foreign Exchange Service for US Customers
The Nine States with the Most Underfunded Pensions