
“Just before Snowden became a household name, the ACLU argued before the supreme court that the Fisa Amendments Act – one of the two main laws used by the NSA to conduct mass surveillance – was unconstitutional. [In its dismissal,] the court relied on two claims by the Justice Department to support their ruling: 1) that the NSA would only get the content of Americans’ communications without a warrant when they are targeting a foreigner abroad for surveillance, and 2) that the Justice Department would notify criminal defendants who have been spied on under the Fisa Amendments Act, so there exists some way to challenge the law in court. Neither of those statements were true.”
Related posts:
U.S. Expats Balk at Tax Law, Reconsider Citizenship
The Winklevosses: Bitcoin worth 100 times more
Syria's Assad bans all foreign currency in commercial transactions
Ex-police officer pleads guilty in murder-for-hire scheme
Essex school bans triangular flapjacks after injury
FBI behind mysterious surveillance aircraft over US cities
Late Marc Rich’s Swiss mansions for sale
Threatening 'IRS' calls, emails are scams, officials warn
Sheriff denies cabin intentionally burnt down with Chris Dorner inside
Federal Judge Shoots Down IRS Attempt To Regulate All Paid Tax Preparers
Forget premiums: A peer-to-peer network will cover you
America's Gilded Capital
Saudi government smashes ‘sinful’ statues of horses
Snapchat market value hits $800 million
Turkey vows to ‘drown’ US-backed insurgent force