
“Just before Snowden became a household name, the ACLU argued before the supreme court that the Fisa Amendments Act – one of the two main laws used by the NSA to conduct mass surveillance – was unconstitutional. [In its dismissal,] the court relied on two claims by the Justice Department to support their ruling: 1) that the NSA would only get the content of Americans’ communications without a warrant when they are targeting a foreigner abroad for surveillance, and 2) that the Justice Department would notify criminal defendants who have been spied on under the Fisa Amendments Act, so there exists some way to challenge the law in court. Neither of those statements were true.”
Related posts:
Michael Hastings Crash Investigation Heats Up; Police and Fire Told Not To Comment
Cops In Texas Seize Millions By 'Policing for Profit'
Pentagon puts 650,000 workers on unpaid leave due to cuts
ACLU Sues U.S. Govt Over Secret NO-FLY List
Companies Cook the Books to Meet Tough Targets: Survey
Bernanke: More room for Fed action. Market runs up.
Developing Detroit: Billionaires say city is worthy of investment
British MPs urged to reject contentious tax pact with the US
Federal Reserve studying effect of Paypal and Bitcoin on banking
Is eBay warming up to Bitcoin?
IKEA surges forward with store openings despite global economic turmoil
Fund Managers Are Ditching Wall Street for Florida's 0% State Income Tax
Egypt targets social media, journalists with 'fake news' law
Dutch finance minister says new support for Greece 'inevitable'
Japan's Shinzo Abe prepares to print money for the whole world