“Just before Snowden became a household name, the ACLU argued before the supreme court that the Fisa Amendments Act – one of the two main laws used by the NSA to conduct mass surveillance – was unconstitutional. [In its dismissal,] the court relied on two claims by the Justice Department to support their ruling: 1) that the NSA would only get the content of Americans’ communications without a warrant when they are targeting a foreigner abroad for surveillance, and 2) that the Justice Department would notify criminal defendants who have been spied on under the Fisa Amendments Act, so there exists some way to challenge the law in court. Neither of those statements were true.”
Related posts:
South Korean Activists Send Leaflets to North Korea
SpaceShipTwo edges closer to powered flight
Honduran Man Killed Himself After Being Separated From Family at U.S. Border
Suicide of Deloitte partner Daniel Pirron linked to Standard Chartered's Iran scandal
Bitcoin Currency Use Impeded by IRS Property Treatment
Bitcoin gets the FBI, Homeland Security treatment
With 'Charity' For All
Filibuster change clears way for White House to stack ObamaCare panel
As-is Melbourne houses fetch more than $1 million above reserve
Venezuela's Inflation Rate Hit 19.9%
Greenwald: NSA's view of drone opponents as 'threats' and 'adversaries'
UK viewers of online terrorist material face 15 years in jail
Inside ‘Liberland,’ the Place of No Taxes Where Crowdfunding Rules
Gadget to stop driver distraction could become compulsory
Seattle ICE attorney charged with stealing immigrants' identities