
“Just before Snowden became a household name, the ACLU argued before the supreme court that the Fisa Amendments Act – one of the two main laws used by the NSA to conduct mass surveillance – was unconstitutional. [In its dismissal,] the court relied on two claims by the Justice Department to support their ruling: 1) that the NSA would only get the content of Americans’ communications without a warrant when they are targeting a foreigner abroad for surveillance, and 2) that the Justice Department would notify criminal defendants who have been spied on under the Fisa Amendments Act, so there exists some way to challenge the law in court. Neither of those statements were true.”
Related posts:
Health Insurers Will Be Charged 3.5% to Use Federal Obamacare Exchanges
2 killed, 8 shot by police in shooting near Empire State Building
Hong Kong Brokers Drive Cabs as Competition Forces Locals Out [2013]
Gold's rebound: Why it's believable this time
Hong Kong relents on patriotism classes on poll eve
Average Swiss wealth hits record high in dollar terms
Venezuelan Officials Visit Qatar to Pitch Cryptocurrency
Disruptions: A Digital Underworld Cloaked in Anonymity
Michigan governor appoints technocrat to run Detroit
Czech pharmacies begin selling medical marijuana
Assad ally said to defect, Putin chides U.S. on Syria
Decades after Eisenhower's warning, military spending may top $700 billion
Former Chicago cop gets 19 years in Latin Kings case
Oklahoma City says sex offenders can't live in tents at trailer park
Soc. Security, Treasury target taxpayers for parents’ decades-old debts