
“The South Dakota state House passed a bill that would ban both red-light cameras and speeding cameras by a whopping 69-1 margin. A Missouri state House panel on Monday heard testimony on a similar bill. A measure has been proposed in Iowa to require cities to justify their need for photo enforcement cameras, and a 2013 bill to ban them outright is still pending in Ohio. Opponents of the red-light cameras span the partisan divide, complaining of invasions of privacy or back-door tax increases — even that the red-light cameras result in more fender-benders at intersections. In some states, the ACLU is a prime driver behind camera-banning legislation; in others, it’s the tea party.”
Related posts:
Syria strike could bring Raytheon payday
Swiss Banking: Still Under Attack By Bankrupt Governments
Germany Fights Population Drop
Crime Lab Scandal Leaves Mass. Legal System In Turmoil
US ramps up Iraq air strikes in support of Kurdish attack on key dam
New Yorkers Trying to Flee Find Moving Isn’t So Easy
Obama Sees ObamaCare as Legacy Too Worthy to Resist
Metal detectors at ballparks by 2015
Obama unveils new retirement savings plan: 'MyRA'
Brewer says his just-add-water beer mix tastes 'just as good' as the original
Scotland Yard stole dead children’s identities
Congress still at near-record low approval rating
Nearly 2,500 British bankers paid over €1m, says EU regulator
U.S. Treasury to BOJ: Do As We Say, Not As We Do
Former cricket captain turned politician Imran Khan detained and ‘interrogated over drone views’ by ...