
“The South Dakota state House passed a bill that would ban both red-light cameras and speeding cameras by a whopping 69-1 margin. A Missouri state House panel on Monday heard testimony on a similar bill. A measure has been proposed in Iowa to require cities to justify their need for photo enforcement cameras, and a 2013 bill to ban them outright is still pending in Ohio. Opponents of the red-light cameras span the partisan divide, complaining of invasions of privacy or back-door tax increases — even that the red-light cameras result in more fender-benders at intersections. In some states, the ACLU is a prime driver behind camera-banning legislation; in others, it’s the tea party.”
Related posts:
US army blocks access to Guardian website to preserve 'network hygiene'
'We could lose everything': Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
China's banks imperiled as property binge fuels mortgage fraud frenzy
Abolish the Drug Enforcement Administration, Help The Poor Instead
Deputy pepper sprays, beats man with Down Syndrome
Visa CEO Charlie Scharf: Moving at the speed of money
China housing inflation quickens to two year high
Overseas Americans: Time to Say 'Bye' to Uncle Sam?
Ukraine crisis could halt Europe’s recovery, ECB warns
Pueblo Chieftain Excludes Independent Candidate From Debates
Family of slain Walmart shoplifting suspect want answers
Tenn. techie denies being hacker in Romney tax returns case
16-year-old student in Turkey turns bananas into plastic
Google plans drone delivery service for 2017
Fed Could End Up Paying Banks $77 Billion Annually on Excess Reserves