“The South Dakota state House passed a bill that would ban both red-light cameras and speeding cameras by a whopping 69-1 margin. A Missouri state House panel on Monday heard testimony on a similar bill. A measure has been proposed in Iowa to require cities to justify their need for photo enforcement cameras, and a 2013 bill to ban them outright is still pending in Ohio. Opponents of the red-light cameras span the partisan divide, complaining of invasions of privacy or back-door tax increases — even that the red-light cameras result in more fender-benders at intersections. In some states, the ACLU is a prime driver behind camera-banning legislation; in others, it’s the tea party.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Fmr. Comptroller David Walker: To help end budget gimmicks, pass this bill
Iran Tanker Owner Seen Expanding Fleet by IHS Amid Sanctions
Midwestern farmers brace to lose billions in trade war
After 'Tan Mom,' New Jersey bans children from tanning beds, spray tans
Bernanke Said to Minimize Asset-Bubble Concern at Meeting
Some consumer PCs also appear to have dangerous Intel exploit
Love it or hate it, bitcoins are a national craze
Japanese scientists invent ‘privacy visor’ to fool Google’s facial recognition software
City sued after officer shoots unarmed man, mistaking shorts for a gun
New turbine to capture energy from both wind and waves slated for testing
ECB's Celebration of Its New $1.4 Billion Tower Is Spoiled by Protesters
Gaming Company Fined $1 Million For Secretly Using Players To Mine Bitcoin
Saudi Arabia agrees to ease Yemen blockade, facing mass starvation warnings
Al Franken's Privacy Concerns About Faceprints
Judge: California can force-feed inmates on hunger strike