
“Warner/Chappell has built a licensing empire based on ‘Happy Birthday,’ which in 1996 was pulling in more than $2 million per year. [..] An important line of text published underneath the song’s lyrics was ‘blurred almost beyond legibility’ in the copy that Warner/Chappell handed over in discovery. Plaintiffs’ lawyers note that it’s ‘the only line of the entire PDF that is blurred in that manner.’ Plaintiffs acquired their own copies of the songbook, including a first edition published in 1916, which didn’t have the song, and versions published 1922 and later, which include it without a copyright notice.”
Related posts:
Maker of Airport Body Scanners Suspected of Falsifying Software Tests
Incoming police chief shoots woman while trying to kill her dog
Reserve Bank of India Issues Virtual Currency Warning
Megaupload founder wants official cryptocurrency
The European Economy You Must Own
From Eye-Bleeding To Eye-Gouging: Thanks, War On Drugs
Ron Paul supports Snowden and Manning in Larry King interview
Food Stamp Nation: 20% of U.S. Households
Greek Island Trials Digital Currency Solution to Boost Economy
Obama heckled over sentencing of Chelsea Manning
Daddy Bloomberg Wants to Require Retailers to Hide Tobacco
Do Stock Buybacks Kill Corporate Innovation, Profits?
Mitt Romney: The Great Deformer - David Stockman
Lawmakers Vote to Let Obama Take Your Passport Without Trial
James Bovard: TSA Bombs the Holidays