
“Warner/Chappell has built a licensing empire based on ‘Happy Birthday,’ which in 1996 was pulling in more than $2 million per year. [..] An important line of text published underneath the song’s lyrics was ‘blurred almost beyond legibility’ in the copy that Warner/Chappell handed over in discovery. Plaintiffs’ lawyers note that it’s ‘the only line of the entire PDF that is blurred in that manner.’ Plaintiffs acquired their own copies of the songbook, including a first edition published in 1916, which didn’t have the song, and versions published 1922 and later, which include it without a copyright notice.”
Related posts:
Inevitable Terrorist Attack: Will You Be Manipulated?
Zimbabwe’s Central Bank Bans Financial Institutions From Crypto Dealings
Jack Lew: Debt Ceiling Drama To Return in October
Florida Police use Driver License Faceprints to Investigate Public At Large
Marijuana Stocks: How to Legally Invest in the Ultimate Cash Crop
Is Cannabis Weed Oil a Miracle Drug?
What Is Hemp Plastic
The big drug database in the sky: A firefighter’s legal nightmare
Bitcoin Mining Pool Ghash.io DDoS-ed in Response to 51% Status?
Undercover agent sneaks past TSA at Newark Airport with ‘bomb’ in pants
Bill Bonner, To the Class of 2014: You’re “Screwed”
Doctor Bloodied, Dragged By Police Off Overbooked Plane So Employees Could Fly
MLB's Magglio Ordonez, Who Earned $133 Million, Running for City's Mayor---as a Socialist
New anti-euro party forms in Germany
Private paramilitaries guard Wisconsin mining site from protesters