
“Warner/Chappell has built a licensing empire based on ‘Happy Birthday,’ which in 1996 was pulling in more than $2 million per year. [..] An important line of text published underneath the song’s lyrics was ‘blurred almost beyond legibility’ in the copy that Warner/Chappell handed over in discovery. Plaintiffs’ lawyers note that it’s ‘the only line of the entire PDF that is blurred in that manner.’ Plaintiffs acquired their own copies of the songbook, including a first edition published in 1916, which didn’t have the song, and versions published 1922 and later, which include it without a copyright notice.”
Related posts:
Texas Cracks Down on Citizen Drone Use
What is the Cost of Mining Gold?
Bitcoin Trading Notes: Market Momentum and Spread Trading
Nonviolent activist tasered at DOJ while protesting for Wall Street prosecutions
His Canadian citizenship is not in doubt. Is Senator Ted Cruz a US citizen?
And the Media Gets It Wrong (Again)
Who Says the Market Cannot Supply Its Own Money?
Why Bitcoin Is Back From The Dead And Surging To All-Time Highs
Secret Service nabs Oklahoma driver’s license equipment burglars
More Sanctuaries for All You Ron Paulians, Vets, Pro-lifers and Anti-Leviathan Types
The Massive Facial Recognition Database That's Hiding in Plain Sight
Paul Craig Roberts: 9/11 After 13 years
Shock Surveillance Video Shows LAPD Officers Body-Slamming ‘Defenseless Woman’ Into the Pavement Dur...
State Legislatures Called To Protect Americans From Weaponized Police Spy Drones
Caymans win a free tax loophole in exchange for their FATCA signature