
“Warner/Chappell has built a licensing empire based on ‘Happy Birthday,’ which in 1996 was pulling in more than $2 million per year. [..] An important line of text published underneath the song’s lyrics was ‘blurred almost beyond legibility’ in the copy that Warner/Chappell handed over in discovery. Plaintiffs’ lawyers note that it’s ‘the only line of the entire PDF that is blurred in that manner.’ Plaintiffs acquired their own copies of the songbook, including a first edition published in 1916, which didn’t have the song, and versions published 1922 and later, which include it without a copyright notice.”
Related posts:
First ‘Jackpotting’ Attacks Hit U.S. ATMs
Gen. Mark S. Martins on Gitmo Military Commissions: “The Will of Our People!”
How to run a cash-only practice and thrive [2010]
Chaos and War
Trump's Medical Marijuana Threat Contradicts the Law and His Own Position
72 Types Of Americans Considered 'Potential Terrorists' In Official Documents
Shakil Khan: Bitcoin can be “money over IP”, but services must get more intuitive
House To Allow Trump Administration To Secretly Shift Intelligence Money
UK Telegraph: 'We No Longer Have Free Markets'
Offshore Jurisdiction Review: Malta
Retire at 65. Become a Ward of the State.
U.S. Dropped 23,144 Bombs on Muslim-Majority Countries in 2015
Shadowy federal agency snooping in your wallet
The Italian government really screwed this poor woman
Bitcoin lawyer: 'Bitcoin still high risk, not yet ready for mainstream'