“Warner/Chappell has built a licensing empire based on ‘Happy Birthday,’ which in 1996 was pulling in more than $2 million per year. [..] An important line of text published underneath the song’s lyrics was ‘blurred almost beyond legibility’ in the copy that Warner/Chappell handed over in discovery. Plaintiffs’ lawyers note that it’s ‘the only line of the entire PDF that is blurred in that manner.’ Plaintiffs acquired their own copies of the songbook, including a first edition published in 1916, which didn’t have the song, and versions published 1922 and later, which include it without a copyright notice.”
Related posts:
Amphibious landing craft docks at crowded beach in Russia
Blockchain.info: the World’s Most Popular Bitcoin Website and Wallet
China's Gold Fever Rises, Showing No Signs Of Abating
The Housing Bubble and the Limits of Human Knowledge
Why doctors are more dangerous than guns
Government works to make federal agencies appear as protagonists on TV
ANZ opens Gold vault in Singapore
New Hampshire governor signs medical marijuana bill into law
Bitcoin Transcends Novelty Status
How Musicians Smashed Racial Barriers
Feds fund $100,000 video game featuring female climate change 'superhero'
Security Hole in Samsung Smart TVs Could Allow Remote Spying
Citing Racial Disparities, Rand Paul Favors Restoration Of Felon Voting Rights
NH City Continues Parking Meter 'Robin Hood' Suit, At Taxpayer Expense
Blocked at U.S. border, Canadian expat lives out of his car in South Surrey