“Georgia claims that a legal rebel, Public.Resource.org, is publishing and making it easy for others to copy the physical text and accompanying annotations of Georgia’s state law—the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. The state’s Code Revision Commission maintains that PublicResource.org is not entitled to reproduce the annotated version of Georgia’s code. Annotations are summaries of the law’s meaning and those summaries are contracted to a third party to write. So what Georgia is essentially saying is it is not OK to copy and distribute the texts of the state’s laws if those texts are accompanied with the state-owned summaries of what the law actually means.”
(Visited 25 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
CFR Floats Neo-Bretton Woods to Create a New Monetary System
Lauryn Hill Ordered by the Court to Undergo “Counseling” Due to her “Conspiracy Theories”
Democrats Grant 'Treasonous' Trump Vast Warrantless Spying Powers
FBI director admits domestic use of drones for surveillance
The Countdown to the Nationalization of Retirement Savings
Ebay has added Virtual Currency to their Coins & Paper money category
NFC Ring can be used to unlock doors, mobile phones and to transfer information and link people
Now Available for You to Buy: America's Most Expensive Home, $190 Million
Illinois: Unconstitutional No-Taping-Cops Law Will Be Prosecuted on “Case by Case Basis”
It’s official – Renouncing US citizenship saved our home
Privacy protections booted from CISPA cybersecurity bill in closed-door hearing
One Honest Cop vs. the "Photo Enforcement" Racket
Prison labor booms in US as low-cost inmates bring billions
Jeffrey Tucker: Bitcoin’s Moment
Lemonade Stands Legalized in Utah