“Georgia claims that a legal rebel, Public.Resource.org, is publishing and making it easy for others to copy the physical text and accompanying annotations of Georgia’s state law—the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. The state’s Code Revision Commission maintains that PublicResource.org is not entitled to reproduce the annotated version of Georgia’s code. Annotations are summaries of the law’s meaning and those summaries are contracted to a third party to write. So what Georgia is essentially saying is it is not OK to copy and distribute the texts of the state’s laws if those texts are accompanied with the state-owned summaries of what the law actually means.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Facebook Security Director, Amazon BD Director Join Coinbase
The Next Financial Disaster Starts Here
Cop fakes body cam footage, prosecutors drop drug charges
FBI director admits domestic use of drones for surveillance
What Is Bitcoin? Tom Woods Talks to Erik Voorhees
Tennessee judge changes baby’s name after ruling it a conflict with her beliefs
While questioning him, FBI shoots and kills man connected to Marathon bombing suspect
Hoarding Gold: China’s Plan for Survival
150 Organizations Condemn Trump's Call for Execution For Drug Offenses
US Pursues 134 Wars Around the World
U.S. Government Wins Appeal in Kim Dotcom Extradition Battle
Twitter bot alerts for anonymous Wikipedia edits from Capitol Hill
Snowden And Manning Saw Something, And Said Something
Prototype Quadrotor with Machine Gun
NDAA Opponents Just Won Their Biggest Victory Since The Blocking Of Indefinite Detention