“Georgia claims that a legal rebel, Public.Resource.org, is publishing and making it easy for others to copy the physical text and accompanying annotations of Georgia’s state law—the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. The state’s Code Revision Commission maintains that PublicResource.org is not entitled to reproduce the annotated version of Georgia’s code. Annotations are summaries of the law’s meaning and those summaries are contracted to a third party to write. So what Georgia is essentially saying is it is not OK to copy and distribute the texts of the state’s laws if those texts are accompanied with the state-owned summaries of what the law actually means.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Uruguay's New Regs: Unreasonable on Purpose?
Where the Big Players Are Buying Housing
UN Drug Bureaucrats Fret About Uruguay's Marijuana Legalization
Legal Marijuana No Simple Matter for Colorado Retailers
Odorless ‘weed candies’ in high schools worry Oregon authorities
300 Year Old Russian Watch Factory Raketa Accepts Bitcoins
The Netherlands Must Police Downloading, EU Court Rules
23 Reasons to Be Bullish on Gold
Paralyzed man sips beer -- using robot arm he controls with his mind
Switzerland’s ‘Crypto Valley’ Set To Test Blockchain Voting
Return Airport Security To The Airlines
How Silicon Valley workers are revolting against ICE overreach
When We Will Celebrate the End of QE, and Why
Bernanke’s Helicopter, and a Note About 9/11
Ballot initiative looks to save Los Angeles pot shops