“Georgia claims that a legal rebel, Public.Resource.org, is publishing and making it easy for others to copy the physical text and accompanying annotations of Georgia’s state law—the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. The state’s Code Revision Commission maintains that PublicResource.org is not entitled to reproduce the annotated version of Georgia’s code. Annotations are summaries of the law’s meaning and those summaries are contracted to a third party to write. So what Georgia is essentially saying is it is not OK to copy and distribute the texts of the state’s laws if those texts are accompanied with the state-owned summaries of what the law actually means.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Pakistan bans BlackBerry messaging, e-mail for “security reasons”
Ohio police chief hospitalized after eating ‘cannabis cake’
China signs currency swap deal with Qatar, in heart of the petro-dollar
U.S. Wants to Bomb ISIS In Syria; Should We First Stop Arming Them?
Reclaiming our Police Forces
Reality Check: Can Ohio Voting Machines Be Hacked? The Facts Behind The Rumors
U.S. Government Forbids Ammo-Making Equipment from China
Iowa City Council Votes To Ban Traffic Cameras And Drones
US Expats and Retained Earnings in Foreign Corporations for 2018
Americans protest against US terror drone attacks
Ron Paul: Why Designate North Korea a 'State Sponsor of Terrorism'?
Italy to invest $2bn in Iran projects as Tehran gets back to business
The NY Times Is as Fed-up as You Are
Lew Rockwell: "The Government Default"
Junior Mining Stocks to Beat Previous Highs