“Georgia claims that a legal rebel, Public.Resource.org, is publishing and making it easy for others to copy the physical text and accompanying annotations of Georgia’s state law—the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. The state’s Code Revision Commission maintains that PublicResource.org is not entitled to reproduce the annotated version of Georgia’s code. Annotations are summaries of the law’s meaning and those summaries are contracted to a third party to write. So what Georgia is essentially saying is it is not OK to copy and distribute the texts of the state’s laws if those texts are accompanied with the state-owned summaries of what the law actually means.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Military Members Speak Out Against Syrian War Through Anonymous Meme
Government Healthcare Propaganda versus The Truth (Seniors Vaccine Edition)
India's Cash Ban Leaves At Least 47 Dead, So Far
Adam Kokesh's Mail from Jail
Ohio Appeals Court Forbids Traffic Stop Over Unpaid Parking Tickets
Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall, Which States Provide the Most Handouts of All?
Vibram required to stop all health claims about its FiveFinger shoes
Study: Depenalizing Drug Possession Associated With Lower Youth Drug Consumption
Reality Check: Senate Moving Forward On Internet Tax Mandate
SpaceX rocket blasts off only to return to its launch pad — without exploding
Vitalik Buterin: Bitcoin Is A Transition Technology
Ben Swann: NSA Using Copyright Claims to Stop Criticism?
Inside Barcelona's Bitcoin Drug Lab
What Does Government Do When People Start Living Healthier? Tax That
'Eminent Domain for the People' Leaves Wall Street Furious