“Georgia claims that a legal rebel, Public.Resource.org, is publishing and making it easy for others to copy the physical text and accompanying annotations of Georgia’s state law—the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. The state’s Code Revision Commission maintains that PublicResource.org is not entitled to reproduce the annotated version of Georgia’s code. Annotations are summaries of the law’s meaning and those summaries are contracted to a third party to write. So what Georgia is essentially saying is it is not OK to copy and distribute the texts of the state’s laws if those texts are accompanied with the state-owned summaries of what the law actually means.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Pepe Escobar: Bandar Bush, 'liberator' of Syria
Human rights advocates raise concerns over increased police Taser use
War Hawk McCain Plays Game on His iPhone During Syria Testimony
In phishing attack, Microsoft’s unmentionables aired by hacktivists
Missouri Cops Ignore State Law, Divert School Funding To Themselves
Reserve Bank of India Issues Virtual Currency Warning
High School AP History Book Rewrites 2nd Amendment
Americans Rejecting Mainstream Media for British Newspaper
Mitt Romney's tax returns being held hostage for $1 million in...Bitcoin?!
Romney Executes Republican Party Power Grab
150,000 Greek Public Sector Job Cuts Pending As Greece Launches Another Grexit "Plan B" Movement
Ron Paul: Feds shouldn't 'interfere' with bitcoin
Google Cancels Pentagon Drone AI Program After Historic Employee Mutiny
Making Heart Surgery Accessible to the Poor, by Embracing Mass Production
Singapore Trials Its Digital Dollar Via Ethereum Blockchain