
“Aside from the glaring demographic homogeneity — all middle-aged-or-older white people who have spent their careers in corporatized Washington establishments — there is a suffocating ideological and viewpoint homogeneity on this panel as well, particularly when it comes to foreign policy. All of the panelists, for instance, were vocal, aggressive advocates of the invasion of Iraq (as were all three GOP presidential candidates featured on this morning’s show).”
https://theintercept.com/2015/11/29/what-debate-means-on-face-the-nation/
Related posts:
The courage of Bradley Manning will inspire others to seize their moment of truth
The Republican Platform and the Mainstreaming of the Gold Standard
White House Takes a Wrong Turn on Salvadoran Refugees
Three Other Presidents Targeted for Befriending Russia
Justin Raimondo: The Lies Behind This War
Ex-Black-Market Employee Believes Feds Only Woke A Monster
Venezuela Runs Out of Toilet Paper, Achieves True Socialism
Bill Bonner: Goodbye, Motor City
Juan Cole: Top Ten Ways US TV News are Screwing us Again on NSA Surveillance Story (Iraq Redux)
The Real, Terrifying Reason Why British Authorities Detained David Miranda
Edward Snowden's not the story. The fate of the internet is
Question the 'National-Defense' Exception to Free Trade
Paul Craig Roberts: Assault On Gold Update
"State Control": What the UN Firearms Treaty is All About
Government Tattoo Statists of America