“Should kidnap victims pay their debts? That, roughly, is the question facing Estonia, which issued £700,000 ($3.4m) and $4m in 40-year bonds in 1927, but was then annexed by the Soviet Union in 1940. Most investors swallowed their losses. But not William Hardison, a Florida-based businessman, who holds around $90,000-worth of the septuagenarian paper. Estonia’s booming, debt-free economy is one of the most successful in the ex-communist world. But the situation with Estonia’s kidnapper is rather different. Russia took on the Soviet Union’s assets and liabilities in 1991, and has since bargained hard to get out of paying the latter.”
http://www.economist.com/node/426616
Related posts:
Stockbroker saves his life by smoking 130,000 government-issued joints
More Renounce US Citizenship but Deny Stereotype
Who Stands Where in the Debate Over Taking Action Against Syria
Essex school bans triangular flapjacks after injury
Rolls-Royce Lays Bare Entrenched Failings to Stunned Investors
German president, contra chancellor Merkel, says whistleblowers like Snowden merit respect
U.K. report on terrorism and Saudi Arabia 'too sensitive' to be made public
Overstock CEO: Why we're accepting bitcoins
Test reveals Facebook, Twitter and Google snoop on links in private messages
Australia’s richest person Gina Rinehart would let prisoners ‘pay for freedom’
Short-term fix eyed for another problem with U.S. healthcare website
Armed thieves steal planeload of Zurich-bound diamonds and gold
Marine’s 11-year war crimes conviction overturned
India's third biggest gold fund reopens to investors
Why McDonald's Killed the Dollar Menu—in 1 Chart