“Should kidnap victims pay their debts? That, roughly, is the question facing Estonia, which issued £700,000 ($3.4m) and $4m in 40-year bonds in 1927, but was then annexed by the Soviet Union in 1940. Most investors swallowed their losses. But not William Hardison, a Florida-based businessman, who holds around $90,000-worth of the septuagenarian paper. Estonia’s booming, debt-free economy is one of the most successful in the ex-communist world. But the situation with Estonia’s kidnapper is rather different. Russia took on the Soviet Union’s assets and liabilities in 1991, and has since bargained hard to get out of paying the latter.”
http://www.economist.com/node/426616
Related posts:
Russian ‘mobile malware’ industry could spread to other countries
South Korea using smartphone app to curb military leaks
Your Computer Is Watching You: AOL Rolls Out Emotion Tracking
Officer admits she didn’t write down ‘snowball’ in weapons charge
The DEA Wants to Use a $37 Pot Sale to Seize a $1.5 Million Anaheim Building
Is There Hope for Recent College Grads?
Iron Ore Slumps to Lowest Since at Least 2009 in China
Honduras police seize $50,000 gold-plated AK-47 rifle
8 Things You Didn't Know About Nikola Tesla
Thousands march through Moscow against Putin
British inventor of the World Wide Web scolds ‘insidious’ Western governments over spying
N.S.A. Says It's Purging Millions of Illegally Gathered Call and Text Records
Phoenix Police Officer Is Sunk By Own Cam
Britain's first physical Bitcoin shop opens in London
Hello Kitty Doll Lands Tulsa State Fair Worker In Jail