“Should kidnap victims pay their debts? That, roughly, is the question facing Estonia, which issued £700,000 ($3.4m) and $4m in 40-year bonds in 1927, but was then annexed by the Soviet Union in 1940. Most investors swallowed their losses. But not William Hardison, a Florida-based businessman, who holds around $90,000-worth of the septuagenarian paper. Estonia’s booming, debt-free economy is one of the most successful in the ex-communist world. But the situation with Estonia’s kidnapper is rather different. Russia took on the Soviet Union’s assets and liabilities in 1991, and has since bargained hard to get out of paying the latter.”
http://www.economist.com/node/426616
Related posts:
Lithuania turns Google Street View on tax cheats
Mt. Gox Head Believes No More Bitcoins Will Be Found
Trump's visa ban also applies to dual citizens
Obama won’t push Middle East peace initiative in Israel trip
British vigilantes fighting revenue-driven traffic enforcement
Hungry Judges Less Likely to Grant Parole [2011]
Asian economies turn to yuan
Court could declare Obamacare subsidies illegal in 34 states
Freddie Gray dies one week after Baltimore arrest for nothing
Bitcoin transformative as the Web, venture capitalist says
U.S. to let spy agencies scour Americans' finances
India raises import duty on gold, silver to 10 per cent
Where FEMA Fell Short, Occupy Sandy Was There
$92 quadrillion: PayPal accidentally makes man a quadrillionaire
Family of bystander killed during high-speed police chase sues police