“‘We managed to survive greater threats in our history . . . than a few disorganized terrorist groups and rogue states without resorting to these sorts of programs. It is not that I do not value intelligence, but that I oppose . . . omniscient, automatic, mass surveillance. . . . That seems to me a greater threat to the institutions of free society than missed intelligence reports, and unworthy of the costs. Analysts (and government in general) aren’t bad guys, and they don’t want to think of themselves as such,’ he replied. But he said they labored under a false premise that ‘if a surveillance program produces information of value, it legitimizes it.'”
Related posts:
Suicide of Deloitte partner Daniel Pirron linked to Standard Chartered's Iran scandal
A Surge in Value for Bitcoin and Currencies Similar to It
Italy risks political crisis as MPS bank scandal turns 'explosive'
More Americans see themselves as lower class
India’s poor ‘duped’ into clinical trials for untested drugs
Texas Women Subjected to Roadside Cavity Search Speak Out After Troopers Indicted
Operation Dead-Mouse Drop
Can you tell the difference between Bush and Obama on the Patriot Act?
German Court Releases Whistleblower from Psychiatric Ward
U.S. tax law has some expatriates waiving the American flag
With Billions at Stake, the Search For Asbestos Clients Intensifies on TV, Web
US Credit Rating Cut by Egan-Jones to AA-
Argentina’s primary elections: Bad dress rehearsal
The National Security Agency: America’s powerful electronic spy service
Death Of The S Corp As A Tax Election?