“‘We managed to survive greater threats in our history . . . than a few disorganized terrorist groups and rogue states without resorting to these sorts of programs. It is not that I do not value intelligence, but that I oppose . . . omniscient, automatic, mass surveillance. . . . That seems to me a greater threat to the institutions of free society than missed intelligence reports, and unworthy of the costs. Analysts (and government in general) aren’t bad guys, and they don’t want to think of themselves as such,’ he replied. But he said they labored under a false premise that ‘if a surveillance program produces information of value, it legitimizes it.'”
Related posts:
U.S. commodity regulator faces court challenge over attempt to regulate cryptocurrency
Secret Service officer charged with attempted burglary, property destruction
Separatism threatens the future of Spain
Russia to Tighten ‘Anti-Terrorism’ Internet Rules
The Hard Truth at Newspapers Across America: Hedge Funds Are in Charge
Pittsburgh Residents Being Fined For Parking In Their Own Driveway
Google ordered to obey FBI’s warrantless data requests
Volatile and surging: Bitcoin popularity on the rise
Medical research on animals often biased, scientists warn
Ecuador launches new digital currency after banning competitors
Pentagon to expand intelligence gathering to rival CIA
Top general: Syrian rebels do not support U.S. interests
Ticket quota whistleblower cop loses NYPD suit
India central bank introduces more policies to curb gold imports
U.S. Army investigates sexual assault prevention officer for sex abuse