“Carney has another vacuous justification: ‘…allowing the use of chemical weapons on a significant scale to take place without a response would represent a significant challenge or threat to the United States’ security interests.’ This is more than empty. It’s crazy. Syria is absolutely rent by a horrible civil war. There is no way that it represents a challenge to the security interests of the U.S., much less a significant challenge. The U.S. government is itself endangering peace and risking a wider war if it attacks Syria. This lowers the security of Americans. I’ve located 3 elaborations of what these supposed security interests might be.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/bidens-and-carneys-vacuous-justifications-for-bombing-syria/
Related posts:
Are You Ready for This Coming Disaster?
The Great Obamacare Intergenerational Swindle
Meles Zenawi: The Ethiopian Marriage of Marxism-Leninism and Capitalism
Japan’s False Dawn
Doug Casey on Syria and the Global RoboCop
Big-Spending Republicans Seek Tax Hikes on Blue States
Judge Napolitano: I am deeply disappointed by Trump's Supreme Court pick
The Greatest Threat to Our Freedoms Is the Government
Is the U.S. the World’s Moral Authority as Obama Thinks?
The Shocking Truth About Regulatory Costs
Scott Horton Radio: 7/27/12 Ryan Alford
Controlled Demolition of Europe Continues
Daniel Ellsberg: "We Are A Part of A Death Squad Country"
Andrew Napolitano: Can the President Legally Kill Americans?
Ron Paul: The Real Meaning of President Obama’s National Security Speeches