“White House aides meanwhile shied away from the question of whether Iraq was better off, 10 years after the United States launched an invasion on the grounds of eradicating weapons of mass destruction which were never found. ‘I think historians have to make the judgment,’ White House spokesman Jay Carney said. ‘I think that ridding the world of Saddam Hussein was a welcome development for the world and for Iraq, but again, the president opposed the policy, as candidate, of invading Iraq and as a candidate for president as well.’ US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel acknowledged the huge human toll the conflict had taken on the Iraqi people.”
Related posts:
Eat, pray, live: the Lagos megachurches building their very own cities
The daughter of Cuba’s vice president defects
15 new UK banks in five years, predicts Metro founder
Sixty people injured in riot at Madrid music festival
Canadian gov't: Private ATMs vulnerable to money-laundering
George Galloway to turn to Kickstarter to fund anti-Tony Blair film
Smugglers use cannon to fire 85 pounds of marijuana into Arizona
DEA regularly mines Americans' travel records to seize millions in cash
AK-47s become hot commodity after U.S. sanctions
New York Police Officer, Customs Officer Arrested For Trafficking Illegal Guns
One Million Children Labor in Africa's Goldmines
Bitcoin Exchange Mt. Gox Still Grappling With Slowdown
Islamic State mints its own 'Islamic Dinar' coins
New PM Modi Tells India’s Hindu Heartland He’s Doing God’s Work
U.S. navigation moves in South China Sea will continue