“Nancy Pelosi suggests that the U.S. should bomb Syria to save children. Does the U.S. have a right to defend children in Syria by bombing government installations? Even if some international lawyers devised some new sort of argument in support of U.S. bombing by basing it on some humanitarian rationale, the U.S. would still have a very difficult case to make. The U.S. has basically forfeited even such an imagined or hypothetical right by its earlier actions of supporting the rebel side. If it bombs Syria now, it is part of a pattern of having chosen the rebel side.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/do-humanitarian-concerns-give-the-u-s-a-right-to-bomb-syria/
Related posts:
Prohibitionists Respond to Repeal: Bootlegging, Racketeering, and Kidnapping Will Go Up Now!
Who’s Making Money in a Market like This?
Your Money Isn't Safe In Any U.S. Financial Institution
Chemical Weapons in Syria? Who Cares!
Jacob Hornberger: Keep It Shut Down!
Did you miss your IRS agent today?
Pepe Escobar: The Real Currency, Gold and Energy War in Mali
Bill Bonner: A New American Century?
Detroit Suffers the Biggest Municipal Bankruptcy Ever — Are Your Muni Bonds Safe?
Gary North: Boehner Has Obama by the Boondoggles.
Yellen Surprise Suggests Investors Should Go On Defense
Cyprus Parliament: “Stuff It, Eurocreeps!”
Housing Vouchers: Equal Opportunity Crime-Sharing
Bahrain, a Brutal U.S. Ally
Interview With Daniel McAdams, Ron Paul's Foreign Policy Advisor
