“Nancy Pelosi suggests that the U.S. should bomb Syria to save children. Does the U.S. have a right to defend children in Syria by bombing government installations? Even if some international lawyers devised some new sort of argument in support of U.S. bombing by basing it on some humanitarian rationale, the U.S. would still have a very difficult case to make. The U.S. has basically forfeited even such an imagined or hypothetical right by its earlier actions of supporting the rebel side. If it bombs Syria now, it is part of a pattern of having chosen the rebel side.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/do-humanitarian-concerns-give-the-u-s-a-right-to-bomb-syria/
Related posts:
The U.S. Will Regret Intervention in Syria
Enhance Public Safety: Disarm the Police!
Saudi Arabia Pushes US Toward Military Strike in Syria
Ron Paul: New Fed Boss Same as the Old Boss
Tom Woods and Pat Buchanan on War, Rand Paul, the Neocons, and More
Eric Margolis: Syrian March To Disaster
Housing Recovery Mirage Over; Bernanke Hoping to Retire Before It's Noticed
New dynamic in Iran's European ties
Anthony Wile: The Danger Beyond Employment Numbers
Interview With Daniel McAdams, Ron Paul's Foreign Policy Advisor
Bill Bonner: America’s faith-based economy
Judge Napolitano on Presidential Executive Orders
Constitution prohibits Trump's pre-emptive strike against N. Korea
Congress and POTUS Agree: The President Can Bomb Whomever, Whenever
Chauvinists and Other Anti-Peace Voices