“In a recent Esquire column, Charles Pierce recalled presidential historian George Reedy’s prediction years ago that so-called ‘shield laws,’ which protect reporters against criminal prosecution for not revealing their sources, would involve de facto government licensing of the press. After all, the law would have to define who qualified as a ‘journalist’ for purposes of such legal protection. And guess what? US Senator Dianne Feinstein just bore him out. She ‘insisted on limiting the legal protection to ‘real reporters’ and not, she said, a 17-year-old with his own website.'”
Related posts:
Paul Craig Roberts: The Real Agenda Of The American Police State
Rebuilding Mogadishu with Local Knowledge
You Are an Anarchist. The Question Is How Often?
Bill Bonner: What Do Bond Investors Know That Stock Investors Don’t?
My Journey in the World of Copyrights
South Africa and Ending Apartheid: The Free-Market Road Not Taken
Why Does Monsanto Always Win?
Will Warrants for Searches Become a Thing of the Past?
With Gold, Don’t Miss the Top
Hold US Policymakers to Their Abysmal Record on Foreign Meddling
Michael Scheuer: Obama, Rice, Kerry, McCain, and Graham intervening for more war
War in Washington: Two Shocking Forecasts
Political Savvy of Osama Bin Laden vs. US Foreign Policy Establishment
The Biggest Interest-Rate Turn in 37 Years
Detlev Schlichter: What is wrong about the euro, and what is not
