“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
Related posts:
Zoning’s Racist Roots Still Bear Fruit
Will the Federal Reserve Taper Off on QE?
The World’s Biggest Ponzi Scheme Exposed
Jeffrey Tucker: How the Internet Saved Civilization
Ed Flynn: Milwaukee Crime Lord, Citizen Disarmament Advocate
The Million Man Market
Internet Governance Meltdown II: The Unilateral Right to Amend
Peter Schiff: The GDP Distractor
Is War With China Inevitable?
John Hussman: Durable Returns, Transient Returns
Was Keynes a Brilliant Investor?
David Galland: Answers from a Monetary Master
The FED’s Money Trap
Detlev Schlichter: Good riddance to deposit ‘insurance’
With Enemies Like This, Who Needs Friends?