
“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
Related posts:
Paul Craig Roberts: As Ye Sow, So Shall Ye Reap
John Hussman: Durable Returns, Transient Returns
Colorado’s New Cannabis Economy
The Taper Caper
Robert Ringer: Handling Change
Why Oil Could Move Higher--Much Higher
A Story of Slavery in Modern America
The Overworked and the Idle
The Grand Experiment: Offloading Risk onto the State
Money Down a Rathole: College, Healthcare, Housing
The Fed: Strangling the Saving Ethic and Values
Nasser Al-Awlaki: The Drone That Killed My Grandson
How I Got Boned by Taxes Two Years in a Row
Bill Bonner: Fed's QE has not created one single extra job
"For Your Own Protection"