
“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
Related posts:
How a Pacifist Accidentally Infused the FBI with Cash
Paul Craig Roberts: Growing Up In America
Mike Gogulski: We Need Freedom of Speech in our Financial Commerce
The burgeoning underground economy
What can you buy from the IRS for $50,000?
The Iraq War: 10 Years Later - Anthony Gregory
Austrian Detroit?
Jeffrey Tucker: An Empire in Panic
Is the U.S. at War with Al-Qaeda?
Bill Bonner: American grifters
Why the Status Quo Is Doomed
The “Chechen Connection”, Al Qaeda and the Boston Marathon Bombings
David Galland: The Other Side of the Wall
The Federal Reserve's Cargo Cult Magic: Housing Will Lift the Economy (Again)
4 Ways Living Abroad Can Give You More Freedom