“Georgia claims that a legal rebel, Public.Resource.org, is publishing and making it easy for others to copy the physical text and accompanying annotations of Georgia’s state law—the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. The state’s Code Revision Commission maintains that PublicResource.org is not entitled to reproduce the annotated version of Georgia’s code. Annotations are summaries of the law’s meaning and those summaries are contracted to a third party to write. So what Georgia is essentially saying is it is not OK to copy and distribute the texts of the state’s laws if those texts are accompanied with the state-owned summaries of what the law actually means.”
Related posts:
Defense Distributed Plans to Make Bitcoins Completely Anonymous
Bitcoin: Digital gold or 'Harlem Shake of currency'?
Private Fee-For-Service Medical Practice Now Accepts Bitcoin
In 2017, 100 Times More Americans Were Killed by Police Than Terrorists
New Line of Police Drones Will Instantly Upload Video to Massive Database
Meet the men who spy on women through their webcams
Family Confronted With Armed Military Police After Leaving Museum
With Every Call for Encryption Restrictions, Officials Make Its Own Case
A Look Inside The "New York Stock Exchange" of Bitcoin
CIA Analyst Michael Scheuer Exposes Syrian War Lobbyists
The Persecution of Rita Hutchens
Bradley Manning’s trial is no more than a ‘judicial lynching’
The EU's Copyright Proposal is Extremely Bad News for Everyone, Especially Wikipedia
Where is This Legendary Investor Putting His Money?
The Senate Just Gave the Pentagon More Money Than Russia's Entire Military Budget.