“Georgia claims that a legal rebel, Public.Resource.org, is publishing and making it easy for others to copy the physical text and accompanying annotations of Georgia’s state law—the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. The state’s Code Revision Commission maintains that PublicResource.org is not entitled to reproduce the annotated version of Georgia’s code. Annotations are summaries of the law’s meaning and those summaries are contracted to a third party to write. So what Georgia is essentially saying is it is not OK to copy and distribute the texts of the state’s laws if those texts are accompanied with the state-owned summaries of what the law actually means.”
Related posts:
Chicago’s Sky-High Tobacco Tax Creates a Huge Black Market
India to settle oil trade dues with Iran in rupees
GMO-Fed Hamsters Become Infertile, Have Stunted Growth
Female soldier gets jail time for fleeing to Canada
Bitfury 400 GH/s Bitcoin Mining Rig Hits US Shores; $19,250 For August Delivery
Michelle Obama’s Princeton classmate is executive of CGI Federal
The Line In The Sand Has Been Drawn
Silicon Valley House Sells for $117.5 Million
Missouri lawmaker wants ‘personal exemption’ from Obamacare birth control mandate
Bill Bonner: Reefer Madness!
Why Bitcoin's Growth is Normal & The S-Curves You Could Never See
Anti-Theft Bitcoin Tracking Proposals Divide Bitcoin Community
Lavabit chief predicts 'long fight' with feds (Q&A)
So, What's It Like To Have a Business in Cyprus Right Now?
ABA Attempts To Claim Copyright On Bank Routing Numbers