“Warner/Chappell has built a licensing empire based on ‘Happy Birthday,’ which in 1996 was pulling in more than $2 million per year. [..] An important line of text published underneath the song’s lyrics was ‘blurred almost beyond legibility’ in the copy that Warner/Chappell handed over in discovery. Plaintiffs’ lawyers note that it’s ‘the only line of the entire PDF that is blurred in that manner.’ Plaintiffs acquired their own copies of the songbook, including a first edition published in 1916, which didn’t have the song, and versions published 1922 and later, which include it without a copyright notice.”
Related posts:
After 2 Years And No Charges, Video Shows Louisiana Cop Executing Merchant
Texas Senate Passes Bill to Establish Gold & Silver Bullion Depository
The Michael Hastings Wreck: Video Evidence Only Deepens The Mystery
Senate Votes To Ban The Libertarian Party From Ohio Election
Lawmakers ‘unjustifiably focus’ on illicit drugs rather than alcohol: report
'Florida's Dirtiest Cop' Charged With Kidnapping Man Who Wanted To File Brutality Complaint
US Arms Both Sides, Will Supply $100 Billion in Arms to Saudi Arabia, Israel
Developer warns: Take Twitter “write access” at your own risk
Two Huge Victories in Colorado for the Second Amendment
Common Core Exams Put on Hold
FISA Spying Abuses - Are You Really Shocked? With Jim Bovard
Condoleezza Rice: Chances of strike on Iran ‘increasing’
Fund managers joining Buffett in preparing for an 'ugly' downturn
What Is at Stake in the BLM vs. Bundy Showdown
Poll: Nearly One Third Of Americans Would Accept ‘TSA Body Cavity Search’ in Order to Fly