
“Warner/Chappell has built a licensing empire based on ‘Happy Birthday,’ which in 1996 was pulling in more than $2 million per year. [..] An important line of text published underneath the song’s lyrics was ‘blurred almost beyond legibility’ in the copy that Warner/Chappell handed over in discovery. Plaintiffs’ lawyers note that it’s ‘the only line of the entire PDF that is blurred in that manner.’ Plaintiffs acquired their own copies of the songbook, including a first edition published in 1916, which didn’t have the song, and versions published 1922 and later, which include it without a copyright notice.”
Related posts:
The Role Disability Insurance is Playing in Discouraging Young Adults from Working
With Every Call for Encryption Restrictions, Officials Make Its Own Case
Feds, Anaheim Try to Seize $1.5M Building . . . With No Charges Against the Owner
Amidst Detroit Banktruptcy, Spontaneous Order and Market Anarchy Flourish
Dairy industry opposes bills lifting restrictions on US raw milk sales
The Jobs Number Is B.S., Says Former Head Of B.L.S.
Legislator's Phony Tirade Denying IRS Targeting Exposed By Emails
New iPad app allows users to virtually try on glasses in 3-D
Bullish on Yellen: A Very Good Article From Forbes
Texas Generally Exempts Bitcoin From Money Transmission Laws
SWAT team sent to home of CNN’s Wolf Blitzer
This is what armed revolution looks like
I Bought Bitcoin In Person And Here's What Happened
Shadowy federal agency snooping in your wallet
Rand Paul’s reversal: I don’t care if a drone kills a liquor store robber with $50 in cash