
“Warner/Chappell has built a licensing empire based on ‘Happy Birthday,’ which in 1996 was pulling in more than $2 million per year. [..] An important line of text published underneath the song’s lyrics was ‘blurred almost beyond legibility’ in the copy that Warner/Chappell handed over in discovery. Plaintiffs’ lawyers note that it’s ‘the only line of the entire PDF that is blurred in that manner.’ Plaintiffs acquired their own copies of the songbook, including a first edition published in 1916, which didn’t have the song, and versions published 1922 and later, which include it without a copyright notice.”
Related posts:
Plants use underground fungus network to send ‘distress signals’ to each other
Pushback as US Expands Surveillance, Taxing Authority?
Glenn Greenwald: Are all telephone calls recorded and accessible to the US government?
PA Police Chief Seeks Nullification of Unconstitutional Gun Control
House votes to uphold increased spending on ‘unneeded and unwanted’ nuclear bombs
From Watery Bourbon To Horse-Meat Chili: Hidden Inflation Is Everywhere
Tennessee Judge Jailing People For Smoking Cigarettes
The Evolution of the Marijuana Marketplace
The Ex-Im Bank Is Dead (For Now)
This Kid Was Suspended for 10 Days Because He ‘Liked’ a Picture of a Gun on Instagram
The "Institutional Investor" Housing Bubble Just Burst
Future of Iran Deal In Hands of GOP Billionaire Iran Hawks
Janet Napolitano Asked About DHS's 2,700 Armored Trucks
Fed Vice Chair: Your Bank May Seize Your Money to Recapitalize Itself
Judge Orders California DA To Return Family's Confiscated Life Savings