“The international community—which includes many multi-tribal, ethnic, racial, or sectarian states—frowns on solutions that formally or implicitly break up states. Many have their own minorities that might be encouraged to break away. Thus, arguments are used that it’s a form of apartheid or that boundaries cannot be drawn exactly and will always leave some unfortunate souls on the other side of the line. In South Africa, apartheid was forced separation using armed might of a minority against a majority. In Iraq and Libya, such decentralized governance would have to be voluntary and would reflect existing ethno-sectarian or tribal areas, respectively.”
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=4700
Related posts:
Police Are More Dangerous To The Public Than Are Criminals
The Deep State or Invisible Government: A Brief Bibliographic Retrospective
David Galland: Toad Tossing
You’re Not That Important
How Bad Can Things Get?
Washington’s Pax Americana Cartel
Murray Rothbard: And Now Afghanistan [1980]
How the Paper Money Experiment Will End
Star-Spangled Confederates: How Southern Sympathizers Decided Our National Anthem
Are commodity prices about to explode?
Inclusionary Zoning Makes Housing Less Affordable
The Endgame of State/Local Government Pensions
Pot And Pregnancy: It’s Harmless, So Why Are Moms Still Prosecuted?
Civil Forfeiture Of Cash: It Could Happen To You
Paul Rosenberg: 'Production Versus Plunder', Part 6
